Forums » Sex

List of newest posts

    • March 23, 2015 10:18:12 PM PDT
    • I've been pondering about my stance on sex and romance lately as well, and though they CAN be mutually exclusive, it's best when they overlap.

      I guess the only "exception" is sex with a close friend that you find physically attractive.

      Trust and comfort are key to good sex (at least for me!!!) because it allows me to express myself freely without fear of judgement, and those are also key elements to a healthy relationship, so they go hand in hand. :)

      It's amazing to share such an intimate, ethereal, yet raw moment with someone that you connect to mentally.

      Then again... I've never had sex with anyone that I wasn't romantically involved with, so my opinion is probably biased. lulz.

    • March 18, 2015 4:29:09 AM PDT
    • Honestly it may not be normal , but I think it is healthier.

    • March 17, 2015 5:16:22 PM PDT
    • Personally I can't enjoy sex without romance, there is no more enjoyment out of it than masturbating so I don't see the point. Is that unusual? It certainly doesn't seem normal among my peers.

    • February 22, 2015 10:53:22 PM PST
    • I would say that It depends on what type of sex your partner likes, if they want someone who is submissive and gives themselves to them I would say INFPs are great at that, (in theory) we would be devoted to pleasing our partner and because of our sensitivity we can intuitively address our partners needs. Also because we want to please our partner (I would say) that if we trusted them enough we would be willing to try out their fantasies and get really crazy and intense. But then again I depends on what the other person wants. If they want someone who is great at one night stands, someone who is just going to Fuck, and that needs no emotional impute/connection I would look somewhere else.

    • February 22, 2015 10:52:14 PM PST
    • a

    • February 21, 2015 8:14:13 AM PST
    • FYI - don't edit your post, it will really fuck it up.

    • February 21, 2015 8:12:03 AM PST
    • "INTJs cuddle! Well, I cuddle anyway. I'll also hold hands in public, give an embrace from behind while she's involved with something mundane, get accused of being affectionate... I'm sure there's more of us. Geeks can be romantics too! =)" - end quote from other guy

      Immature INTJ: Says they like cuddling despite wanting nothing more than to sleep on their side of the bed, unbothered, because they want to get the woman into bed.

      Mature INTJ: Admits they don't enjoy cuddling, but it doesn't matter because they just gave the woman 7 orgasms

    • February 19, 2015 2:20:49 PM PST
    • ISFJ's, only ever had intense experiences with them. They are designed to be dominated. I wouldn't have it any other way!

    • February 14, 2015 8:07:25 AM PST
    • For me, in terms of purely primal, chemical lust, the satisfaction of my bodily urges, it has been ESTJ ladies, hands-down. A shame that our real-world goals never align, they're the only Sensor I've been able to sustain a deeply sexual attraction for.

    • January 14, 2015 11:12:31 PM PST
    • My best was with an ISFP. I'm having trouble getting into other types. Why do ISFPs all have to be alcoholics? Haha, darn, I'm cursed. I've tried 3 ISFP, 2 SJ of some sort, an ESFP, an ENTJ and an INTP. (That I can remember.)

      Of course I'd say INTJs are the best, but I have yet to sample them. I can't exaclty count myself in the experiment. I would venture to guess there would be some bias involved. Hah

      Oh, I'm curious what xNFPs are like.

    • January 7, 2015 1:22:03 AM PST
    • ISTJs, don't underestimate us. No one knows the body and it's pleasures like us. We know the best spots and the best ways to make a body feel good. We are highly tactile and have a lot of bodily control and dexterity. We know the subtle and distinct differences between pleasures and know exactly how to maximize them. Put all of this together, and you'll be orgasisming from the massage alone.

    • December 28, 2014 9:43:17 AM PST
    • ITT: everyone posts their type or their ideal match.

    • December 15, 2014 4:22:14 PM PST
    • If we could prove that INTJs are truly the best at sex, it would be a huge relief--I would no longer feel guilty when I masturbate.

    • November 18, 2014 1:34:01 PM PST
    • Self confidence is a major turn on. Not arrogance, but someone who can look at themselves and know they are incredible just the way you are. I'm a big girl, but I am beautiful, passionate, and smart. My weight does not define me. What are you letting define you? Because it isn't helping you be who you are. It is just creating a negative you.

    • November 18, 2014 1:17:20 PM PST
    • If someone wanted me, they would receive more intense fire than a Supernova.
      But no one does.

    • November 17, 2014 10:47:23 PM PST
    • Actually I think this is a silly question. I think it is the situation that makes great sex. There is sex for mere pleasure...chemistry, and their is sex that involves emotion and commitment. Depending on your personality and your drive will determine what situation is best. I have experienced both, and I as an ENFJ give much more when my emotions are involved and the feelings are mutual and I am secure in the relationship. When It is just chemistry I am much more reserved and withhold my whole self.

    • November 8, 2014 5:44:42 AM PST
    • timtron said:
      Everyone is just stroking their ego by claiming they're the best. However those if us in the know know which type has the most social confidence and sexual prowess. Clue: the performer.. :p

      In my experience, this is way off base... Not only was my ex-husband 'a performer' he really was a performer and ...Nope, Not, Uh Uh on the best of scale.

    • November 8, 2014 5:41:06 AM PST
    • Rift Zone said:
      balletstarla said:
      A good INTJ can be smoltering... but I don't think they cuddle. I like all the INFJ votes - I'm now an INFP, but was an INFJ for many years. I've still got it.

      INTJs cuddle! Well, I cuddle anyway. I'll also hold hands in public, give an embrace from behind while she's involved with something mundane, get accused of being affectionate... I'm sure there's more of us. Geeks can be romantics too! =) nirvanaJS mentioned: "NTJs: conquer and dominate their partners" Me: Dominate, yes. Conquer? I have to say that's a foreign concept in bed. Sex is a physical, emotional, psychological and spiritual act. I love the intimacy to be found there. If I had any triumphs at all it would be turning my woman into an orgasmic mess.

      INTJ's cuddle and I, at least, am very touchy feely in public and not. I agree.

    • August 31, 2014 11:32:18 PM PDT
    • I do not think this is necessarily type related, but rather having more to do with the individual connection made. A good connection expands one's consciousness. Love is a powerful force. :)

    • October 25, 2014 8:03:09 PM PDT
    • Um. In my experience, I don't find that ppl typically lay out ground rules before sex.
      But my personal suggestion might be to do so with your partner if you're considering a 3way AND BEFORE you get into the bed room (so as not to make the 3rd party uncomfortable with couple bickering, lol)

    • October 25, 2014 7:59:09 PM PDT
    • From what I recall of stats, at LEAST 80% of the human population self-gratifies (or has at one time or another). I believe it was higher, but I can't recall the specific details.

      As for personal thoughts: Its circumstantial.
      I find that thoughts of attractive friends' intimate contours can be engaging, as well as their likely responses to one's given sexual attentions. (Er, 'thinking of friends and their reaction to pleasuring or being pleasured', lol.)

      I like your idea of creating back stories though.
      I tended to do (write) such things for other people, more than myself, but I do find it quite enjoyable.

    • September 25, 2014 3:41:24 AM PDT
    • Sorry, topic should not be in this forum. Mistakenly put it here :p

      So please carry on with your day and have a nice life! If you know how to delete thread, I would really appreciate it!

    • September 24, 2014 8:36:58 PM PDT
    • Which mbti type(s) would you say is:

      1.Prone to be most evil in respect to society?
      2.Has the most potential to be evil?

      My personal opinion:
      1. SJs, primarily ESTJ. Most of these individuals manage to get to positions of management and power. Most of them primarily make selfish decissions where they want a materialistic or control based outcome to thrive.

      2.In western media, typically INTJ are pictured as such. But INTJ I noticed tend to be quite passive and have a "live and let live" kind of attitude.

      Whereas I would say INFJ have the most potential. These individuals want to change the world in what they can provide for it. So if they are emotionally pushed, they will utilize relentless logic and become very proficient at manipulation.

      NFs in general, tend to be very warm open people that orient themselves to changing the world. Many dictators worldwide have been ENFJ and ENFP.

      But INFJ, and NFs wouldn't hurt a fly for the most part. So it is a rarity. But for potential of evil, I would argue this stance.

      What are your thoughts guys?

    • July 25, 2014 7:41:48 AM PDT
    • although to be honest I'm not that promiscuous...not that I'm not trying to be.

    • July 25, 2014 7:40:21 AM PDT
    • Last sentence same. As much as I like to be independent useful and some manner of a provider for my significant other I'd would really want them to have some sort of almost unspoken hold over. Despite what I might verbalize interally I want to have no qualms about submitting to my lover...whomever they may be...